A.6.P:12 — Relations

Preface node heading:a-6-p-12-relations:13760

What this page is

This is generated FPF reference text from the specification preface or supporting sections. It helps interpret FPF; it is not FPF Reference product documentation.

Methodology

Use it to understand how the specification wants to be read, then return to a route, pattern, or work packet for active work. Cite generated IDs only when the wording changes the task decision.

Content

Specialised by

  • A.6.5 U.RelationSlotDiscipline — slot precision restoration for n‑ary relations.
  • A.6.6 U.BaseDeclarationDiscipline — base‑dependence precision restoration (SWBD + base‑change lexicon + anchor* red‑flags).
  • A.6.8 (RPR‑SERV) — service polysemy unpacking as a relation and facet precision restoration discipline (serviceSituation lens + canonical rewrites + service‑specific tests and change narration).
  • A.6.9 (RPR-XCTX) - U.CrossContextSamenessDisambiguation - Repairing cross-context "same", "equivalent", "align", or "map" via explicit Bridges
  • A.6.H (RPR‑WHOLE) — wholeness language unpacking (“whole, part, integrity, or complete”) into boundary, typed parthood, explicit Γ selection, order and time classification, and A.15 completeness and coverage claims.

Coordinates with

  • A.6.S U.SignatureEngineeringPair — RPR rewrite operations can be packaged as a ConstructorSignature for engineered relation specialisations; must preserve canonical verb mapping and effect‑free constructor semantics.
  • A.19 U.CharacteristicSpace + A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW — for declared characteristic spaces, guarded role references, and interpretive-view and atlas-view discipline when one relation repair needs those layers explicit.
  • G.2 — for palette, front, archive, or tradition-atlas specialization when the repaired passage is SoTA-harvest or synthesis prose.
  • F.18 — when the remaining issue is naming-side choice among candidate labels rather than relation typing or publication-use repair.
  • C.2.2a, A.16, A.16.1, A.16.2, B.4.1, and B.5.2.0 + C.2.LS, C.2.4, C.2.5, C.2.6, and C.2.7 - relation publication enters only after admissible language-state chart positioning, articulation, and closure record exist; earlier cue-pack material stays under the language-state boundary, prompt-shaped continuations stay with B.5.2.0, retreat or reopen moves remain governed by A.16.2, and A.16.0 is used only when lineage, branch, loss, or responsibility-transfer history must itself be published.

Candidate extraction signals (informative; not queued specialisations)

These recurring relation-repair families are signals for applying the E.10.ARCH extraction criterion. They do not by themselves create a new A.6.x pattern.

  • Cross‑Context equivalence / “sameness” discipline (Bridge + loss-note relation patterns)
  • Correspondence and consistency + repair discipline (sync and alignment relation patterns)
  • Transfer and responsibility-transfer discipline (multi‑party “give, assign, or accountability” relation patterns)

Last Updated: 2026-06-17 — upstream FPF commit 646b0b9b (github.com/ailev/FPF)