FPF Reference

    A.6.C:9 — Consequences

    Preface node heading:a-6-c-9-consequences:9685

    What this page is

    This is generated FPF reference text from the specification preface or supporting sections. It helps interpret FPF; it is not FPF Reference product documentation.

    Methodology

    Use it to understand how the specification wants to be read, then return to a route, pattern, or work packet for active work. Cite generated IDs only when the wording changes the task decision.

    Content

    Benefits

    • Category mistakes (“contract soup”) become systematically repairable.
    • Commitments become accountable (named roles) and adjudicable (evidence expectations).
    • Boundaries remain evolvable: laws, gates, governance, and evidence can evolve with controlled coupling.

    Trade-offs and mitigations

    • Additional authoring effort; mitigated by applying the unpacking only when contract-language appears or when a claim is used for decision or publication.
    • Some stakeholders prefer “one sentence contract”; mitigated by MVPK faces that present curated projections while keeping the underlying claim set coherent.

    Last Updated: 2026-06-17 — upstream FPF commit 646b0b9b (github.com/ailev/FPF)